HUMAN BEING AS PROJECTION OF SPACIAL AND TEMPORARY CONNECTIONS: PROJECTIONS AND CHALLENGES OF SOCIAL-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION


Cite item

Abstract

The human being is involved to social interaction to try is realizing two ways of communication – in space and time as positions here and now. The process of identification and self-consciousness of person is determined mainly in this double-sector communicative model. As a result, each individual performs a kind of projection of the spaсial and temporary relations in the communicative system of culture. Cultural communication is a complicated and dramatic process of development of humanity. The authors see two vectors of human identification in this process – individualization and generalization. It is shown the effective means of new structuring of historical experiences and innovative practices are new technologies and multifunctional systems in the form of multimedia, multiplications, multiplex and other multi- communications. The new technologies not only allow us to solve effectively the urgent tasks on social transformation, but also they throw a challenge to contemporary society by means of the cultivating of digital consciousness, virtual values and new imitative environment.

Full Text

ЧЕЛОВЕК В СИСТЕМЕ ПРОСТРАНСТВЕННО-ВРЕМЕННЫХ СВЯЗЕЙ:ПРОЕКЦИИ И ВЫЗОВЫ СОЦИОКУЛЬТУРНОЙ КОММУНИКАЦИИ
×

About the authors

Vladimir M. Nesterenko

Samara State Technical University

Email: nesterenko.fgo@gmail.com
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head, department of Psychology and Pedagogics. 244, Molodogvardeiskaya st., Samara, 443100

Vladimir I. Ionesov

Samara State Technical University

Email: ionesov@mail.ru
Doctor of Cultural Studies, Associate Professor, department of Psychology and Pedagogics. 244, Molodogvardeiskaya st., Samara, 443100

References

  1. Белкин А.И., Ионесов В.И. Особенности психо-культурного опосредования ментальности авторов граффити и процесса мультикультурной интеграции //Известия Самарского научного центра РАН. –2011. – Т. 13. – №2 (6). – С. 1494 – 1501.
  2. Жирар Р. Насилие и священное. – М.: Новое культурное обозрение, 2000. –400 с.
  3. Ионесов В.И.Всемирное наследие в дискурсе культурно-антропологического знания // Наследие и гуманизм: культурная антропология на службе человечества: Материалымеждунар. науч. конф. (29 ноября 2009, Самара). – Самара: СГАКИ, 2010. – С. 58 – 87.
  4. Ионесов В.И. Мультикультурализм как интеграционный процесс: модели трансформации //Креативная экономика и социальные инновации: Междунар. науч. информ.-аналит. эл. журнал.– 2011. – № 1 (1). – С. 60 – 65.www.cesi-journal.com (дата обращения: 30/09/2013).

Copyright (c) 2013 Nesterenko V.M., Ionesov V.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies