<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Vestnik of Samara State Technical University Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Vestnik of Samara State Technical University Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Самарского государственного технического университета. Серия: Психолого-педагогические науки</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1991-8569</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2712-892X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Samara State Technical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">70606</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2021.3.11</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Educational psychology</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Психология образования</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Students ‘view on distance education</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Дистанционное образование глазами студентов</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-9194</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Maksimyuk</surname><given-names>Elena V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Максимюк</surname><given-names>Елена Валентиновна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Cand. Philol. Sci., Associate Professor of Foreign Languages Department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры «Иностранные языки»</p></bio><email>Grechko_EV@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Siberian State Road University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Сибирский государственный автодорожный университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-10-21" publication-format="electronic"><day>21</day><month>10</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>157</fpage><lpage>170</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-05-14"><day>14</day><month>05</month><year>2021</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2021-09-16"><day>16</day><month>09</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2021, Maksimyuk E.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2021, Максимюк Е.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Maksimyuk E.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Максимюк Е.В.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnik-pp.samgtu.ru/1991-8569/article/view/70606">https://vestnik-pp.samgtu.ru/1991-8569/article/view/70606</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper analyzes the results of an associative experiment conducted with second-year students (SibADI, Omsk) in the fall of 2020 with the aim of assessing the experience of the mass introduction of distance learning technologies, assessing the receptive reactions of students, identifying the degree of emotional comfort of learning during a pandemic, the difficulties they had to be faced, their sources and the degree of recurrence. The results of the study became the basis for the development of methodological recommendations in order to increase the degree of effectiveness of the educational process in a distance format.</p> <p>The introduction reveals the essence of the concept of distance education, its goals and objectives at different stages in different countries. A number of advantages provided by the distance learning format and its relevance in the modern world are highlighted.</p> <p>The results of the experiment showed that not all students are psychologically ready for a sharp transition to distance learning. The wide public resonance aroused increased interest in researching the problems that have arisen in this educational sphere.</p> <p>The associative experiment took place in two stages. The first question was aimed at identifying the preferences of the form of education of full-time students. The question was: «What form of education do you prefer full-time or distance learning?» The responses ratio was 70:30. Seventy percent of the surveyed respondents preferred full-time education, the rest — distance learning. In the second part, they were invited to take part in an associative experiment to reconstruct a fragment of the national linguistic picture of the world in a certain historical period. Through an associative experiment, we were able to identify and analyze the psychoemotional assessment of the components and their frequency within the modified concept of “distance education”; practical recommendations of a didactic nature were proposed for reducing negative connotations and removing psychological barriers in the process of distance learning.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье анализируются результаты ассоциативного эксперимента, проведенного со студентами второго курса (СибАДИ, г. Омск) осенью 2020 г. с целью оценки опыта массового внедрения дистанционных технологий обучения, оценки рецептивных реакций студентов, вскрывающих степень эмоционального комфорта во время обучения в период пандемии, трудности, с которыми им пришлось столкнуться, их источники и степень частотности. Результаты исследования стали основой для разработки методических рекомендаций с целью повышения степени эффективности образовательного процесса в дистанционном формате.</p> <p>Введение раскрывает суть понятия «дистанционное образование», его цели и задачи на разных этапах в разных странах. Подчеркивается ряд преимуществ, которые дает дистанционный формат обучения, и его востребованность в современном мире.</p> <p>Результаты эксперимента показали, что не все обучающиеся были психологически готовы к резкому переходу образования на дистанционный формат. Широкий общественный резонанс вызвал повышенный интерес к исследованиям возникших проблем в этом образовательном поле.</p> <p>Исследование проходило в два этапа. Первый этап был направлен на выявление предпочтений формы обучения учащихся очной формы обучения. На этом этапе обучающимся был задан вопрос: «Какую форму обучения вы предпочитаете — очную или дистанционную?». Ответы разделились в пропорции 70:30. 70 % процентов опрошенных респондентов предпочли очную форму обучения, остальные — дистанционную. Второй этап был организован в виде ассоциативного эксперимента, направленного на реконструкцию фрагмента национальной языковой картины мира в определенный исторический период. Посредством ассоциативного эксперимента нам удалось выявить и проанализировать психоэмоциональную оценку компонентов и их частотность внутри модифицированного концепта «дистанционное образование», были предложены практические рекомендации дидактического характера для редуцирования негативных коннотаций и снятия психологических барьеров в процессе дистанционного обучения.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>distance education</kwd><kwd>associative experiment</kwd><kwd>educational process</kwd><kwd>efficiency</kwd><kwd>technology</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>дистанционное образование</kwd><kwd>ассоциативный эксперимент</kwd><kwd>образовательный процесс</kwd><kwd>эффективность</kwd><kwd>технологии</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Teoriya i praktika distantsionnogo obucheniya [Theory and practice of distance learning]. pod red. Ye.S. Polat. Moscow: Akademiya Publ., 2004. 416 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Теория и практика дистанционного обучения / под ред. Е.С. Полат. – М.: Академия, 2004. – 416 c.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polat Ye.S. Pedagogicheskiye tekhnologii distantsionnogo obucheniya [Distance learning pedagogical technologies]. Moscow: Akademiya Publ., 2006. 392p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полат Е.С. Педагогические технологии дистанционного обучения. – М.: Академия, 2006. – 392 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khusyainov T.M. Istoriya razvitiya i rasprostraneniya distantsionnogo obrazovaniya [History of the development and spread of distance education]. Pedagogika i prosveshcheniye. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 30−41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хусяинов Т.М. История развития и распространения дистанционного образования // Педагогика и просвещение. – 2014. – № 4. – С. 30–41.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zaychenko T.P. Invariantnaya organizatsionno-didakticheskaya sistema distantsionnogo obucheniya [ Invariant organizational-didactic system of distance learning]. St. Petersburg: Asterion Publ., 2004. 188 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зайченко Т.П. Инвариантная организационно-дидактическая система дистанционного обучения: монография. – СПб.: Астерион, 2004. – 188 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivanchenko D.A. Sistemnyy analiz distantsionnogo obucheniya [System analysis of distance learning]. Moscow: Soyuz Publ., 2005. 192 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иванченко Д.А. Системный анализ дистанционного обучения: монография. – М.: Союз, 2005. – 192 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bukovski S. Metodicheskiye priyemy i kompleks uprazhneniy kreativnogo obucheniya pri podgotovke k referirovaniyu inoyazychnykh tekstov v neyazykovom vuze [Methodological techniques and a set of creative learning exercises in preparation for abstracting foreign language texts in a non-linguistic university]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 45−58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Буковски С. Методические приемы и комплекс упражнений креативного обучения при подготовке к реферированию иноязычных текстов в неязыковом вузе // Педагогика и психология образования. –2020. – № 1. – С. 45–58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Voronina D.K. K voprosu o metodologii integratsii nauchnykh distsiplin «Informatika» i «Angliyskiy yazyk» na osnove analiza trebovaniy FGOS [On the issue of interdisciplinary integration of educational disciplines «Informatics» and «English language» based on the analysis of the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. 2020. No. 4. Pp. 81−90.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Воронина Д.К. К вопросу о междисциплинарной интеграции учебных дисциплин «Информатика» и «Английский язык» на основе анализа требований ФГОС // Педагогика и психология образования. – 2020. – № 4. – С. 81–90.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nuriyev N., Starygina S.D. Didakticheskaya inzheneriya kak metodika avtomatizirovannoy uchebnoy deyatel’nosti [Didactic engineering as a method of organizing automated educational activity]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. 2020. No. 2. Pp. 9−24.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Нуриев Н., Старыгина С.Д. Дидактическая инженерия как методика организации автоматизированной учебной деятельности // Педагогика и психология образования. – 2020. – № 2. – С. 9–24.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sorokoumova Ye.A., Lobanova A.V. Issledovaniye struktury intellekta vzroslykh, obuchayushchikhsya v usloviyakh informatsionnogo prostranstva [Study of the structure of the intellect of adults studying in the information space]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. 2020. No. 4. Pp. 185−197.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сорокоумова Е.А., Лобанова А.В. Исследование структуры интеллекта взрослых, обучающихся в условиях информационного пространства // Педагогика и психология образования. – 2020. – № 4. – С. 185–197.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Korepanova N.V., Shuvalova N.V. Sovremennyye podkhody k povysheniyu kvalifikatsii prepodavateley vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy [Modern approaches to advanced training of teachers of higher educational institutions]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. 2020. No. 4. Pp. 132−138.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Корепанова Н.В., Шувалова Н.В. Современные подходы к повышению квалификации преподавателей высших учебных заведений // Педагогика и психология образования. – 2020. – № 4. – С. 132–138.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Ag-Ahmad N. Open and Distance Learning (ODL): Preferences, Issues and Challenges amidst Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT). 2020. Vol. 8. No. 2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350790153 (accessed June 21, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Adnan M., Anwar K. Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Applied Learning &amp; Teaching. 2020. No. 2 (1). Рр. 2–8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Crawford J., Butler-Henderson K., Rudolph J., Glowatz M. COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning &amp; Teaching. 2020. No. 3(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7 (accessed June 22, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Mailizar Almanthari A., Maulina S., Bruce S. Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views on e-learning implementation barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2020. No. 16 (7). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8240 (accessed June 22, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Zhong R. The Coronavirus Exposes Education’s Digital Divide. The New York Times. 2020. March 17. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/technology/china-schools-coronavirus.html%0Ahttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/technology/chinaschoolscoronavirus.html%0Afile:///C:/Users/Mathi/Desktop/Covid 19 Digital Divide/Digital Divide 6th May/The Coronavirus Exp. (accessed June 22, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Ben-Amram Miri, Davidovitch Nitza. The COVID-19 Period: A Crisis for on-Site Learning or an Opportunity for Optimal Distance Learning? Examination of Student Attitudes Journal of Education and Learning. 2021. Vol. 10. No. 3. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education. Pp. 27–38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Reimers F.M., Schleicher A. A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. OECD. 2021. March 15. https://globaled.gse.harvard.edu/files/geii/files/framework_guide_v1_002.pdf (accessed June 22, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Armakolas Stefanos. Teleconference Sessions in Distance Learning Courses: The Influence of Psychological Factors. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design. 2021, April–June. Vol. 11. No. 2. Рp. 1–15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Misirli Ozge. Emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: Parents experiences and perspectives. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10520-4 (accessed June 30, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Brooks S.K., Webster R.K., Smith L.E., Woodland L., Wessely S., Greenberg N., Rubin G.J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet. 2020. No. 395 (10227). Рр. 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8 (accessed June 30, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Dong C., Cao S., Li H. Young children’s online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Children and Youth Services Review. 2020. P. 118. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105440 (accessed June 30, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Hodges C., Moore S., Lockee B., Trust T., Bond A. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Education Review. 2020. No. 27. Рр. 1–12. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/thediference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning (accessed June 30, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Parczewska T. Difficult situations and ways of coping with them in the experiences of parents homeschooling their children during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland. Education. 2020. No. 3 (13). Рр. 1–12. https://doi. org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1812689 (accessed June 1, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Trzcińska-Król M. Students with special educational needs in distance learning during the COVID19 pandemic – parents’ opinions. Interdisciplinary Context of Special Pedagogy. 2020. No. 29 (1). Pp. 173–191. https:// doi.org/10.14746/ikps.2020.29.08 (accessed June 11, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Bozkurt A., Sharma R.C. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education. 2020. No. 15 (1). i–vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083 (accessed June 12, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Chang G.C., Satako Y. How are countries addressing the Covid-19 challenges in education? A snapshot of policy measures. World Education. 2020. https://www.gecv.ac.in/uploads/ssip/UNESCO%20snap%20shot%20for%20maintaining%20education.pdf (accessed June 12, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Kanellopoulos A., Koutsouba M., Giosos I. Audiovisual learning and videoconferencing in distance education. Open Education. The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology. 2020. No. 16 (1). Рр. 44–63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Armakolas S., Panagiotakopoulos C. Distance learning through videoconferencing: the effects of technological factors. Open Education. The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology. 2020. No. 16 (1). Рр. 22–43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>UNICEF and Microsoft launch global learning platform to help address COVID-19 education crisis. UNICEF. Retrieved October 15, 2020. https://www.unicef.org/ukraine/en/press-releases/ unicef-and-microsoft-launch-global-learning-platform-help-address-covid-19-education (accessed June 12, 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maksimyuk Ye.V. Kognitivno-semanticheskoye modelirovaniye obrazovatel’nogo schast’ya v diskurse razlichnykh zhanrovykh realizatsiy [Cognitive-semantic modeling of images of happiness in the discourse of various genre realizations]. Omsk: SibADI, 2010. P. 5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Максимюк Е.В. Когнитивно-семантическое моделирование образов счастья в дискурсе различных жанровых реализаций. – Омск: СибАДИ, 2010. – С. 5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bakhtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki [Literature and aesthetics]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1975. Pp. 235–285.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бахтин М.М. Вопросы литературы и эстетики. – М.: Художественная литература, 1975. – С. 235–285.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tarasov Ye.F. Aktual’nyye problemy analiza yazykovogo soznaniya [Actual problems of the analysis of linguistic consciousness]. Yazyk soznaniya i struktura mira. Moscow: RAN, 2000. Pp. 24−33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тарасов Е.Ф. Актуальные проблемы анализа языкового сознания // Язык сознания и структура мира. – М.: РАН, 2000. – С. 24–33.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gavrilina M.V. Obrazy i struktura yazykovogo soznaniya [Images and structure of linguistic consciousness]. Yazykovoye soznaniye. Ustoyavsheyesya i spornoye: XIV mezhdunarodnyy simpozium po psikholingvistike i teorii kommunikatsii. Moscow, 2003. P. 55.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гаврилина М.В. Образы и структура языкового сознания // Языковое сознание. Устоявшееся и спорное: XIV международный симпозиум по психолингвистике и теории коммуникации. – М., 2003. – C. 55.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zalevskaya A.A. Natsional’no-kul’turnaya spetsifika kartiny mira i raznyye podkhody k yeye issledovaniyu [National and cultural specifics of the picture of the world and different approaches to its study]. Yazykovoye soznaniye i obraz mira. Moscow, 2000. Pр. 39−54.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Залевская А.А. Национально-культурная специфика картины мира и разные подходы к ее исследованию // Языковое сознание и образ мира. – М., 2000. – С. 39–54.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leont’yev A.N. Psikhologiya obraza [The psychology of the image]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya. 1979. No. 2. Pp. 3−13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Леонтьев А.Н. Психология образа // Вестник Московского Университета. Сер. 14. Психология. – 1979. – № 2. – С. 3–13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leont’yev D.A. Psikhologiya smysla: printsipy, dinamika i struktura smyslovoy real’nosti [Psychology of meaning: principles, dynamics and structure of meaningful reality]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 1999. 512 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Леонтьев Д.А. Психология смысла: принципы, динамика и структура смысловой реальности. – М.: Смысл, 1999. – 512 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pimenova M.V. O tipovykh strukturnykh elementakh kontseptov vnutrennego mira na primere kontsepta «dusha» [On typical structural elements of concepts of the inner world on the example of the concept of «soul»]. Yаzyk. Etnos, Kartina mira. Seriya: Kontseptual’nyye issledovaniya. Kemerovo: Grafika Publ., 2003. Pp. 28−39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пименова М.В. О типовых структурных элементах концептов внутреннего мира на примере концепта «душа» // Язык. Этнос, Картина мира. Сер.: Концептуальные исследования. – Кемерово: Графика, 2003. – С. 28–39.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Luriya A.R. Yаzyk i soznaniye [Language and consciousness]. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. Un-ta, 1979. 320 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лурия А.Р. Язык и сознание. – М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1979. – 320 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Frumkina R.M. Lingvist kak poznayushchaya lichnost’ [Linguist as a cognizing person]. Yаzyk i kognitivnaya deyatel’nost’. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1989. Pp. 38−46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фрумкина Р.М. Лингвист как познающая личность // Язык и когнитивная деятельность. – М.: Наука, 1989. – С. 38–46.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leont’yev A.A. Yаzyk i rechevaya deyatel’nost’ v obshchey i pedagogicheskoy psikhlogii [Language and speech activity in general and pedagogical psychology]. Moscow; Voronezh: MODEK Publ., 2001. 444 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Леонтьев А.А. Язык и речевая деятельность в общей и педагогической психологии. – М.; Воронеж: МОДЕК, 2001. – 444 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zalevskaya A.A. Natsional’no-kul’turnaya spetsifika kartiny mira i raznyye podkhody k yeye issledovaniyu [National-cultural specificity of the picture of the world and different approaches to its study]. Yazykovoye soznaniye i obraz mira. Moscow, 2000. Pp. 39−54.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Залевская А.А. Национально-культурная специфика картины мира и разные подходы к ее исследованию // Языковое сознание и образ мира. – М., 2000. – С. 39–54.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dotsenko T.I. O strukturnykh svyazyakh assotsiativno-verbal’noy seti [On the structural connections of the associative-verbal network]. Yаzykovoye soznaniye. Ustoyavsheyesya i spornoye. Moscow: RAN, 2003. P. 83.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Доценко Т.И. О структурных связях ассоциативно-вербальной сети // Языковое сознание. Устоявшееся и спорное. – М.: РАН, 2003. – С. 83.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
