Vestnik of Samara State Technical University Psychological and Pedagogical SciencesVestnik of Samara State Technical University Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences1991-85692712-892XSamara State Technical University5237610.17673/vsgtu-pps.2019.1.7Research ArticlePedagogical conditions of development of foreign language communicative competence of studentsMorozovaAnna L.Cand. Ped. Sci., Associate Professor of the English Language Departmentllg04@yandex.ruOdintsovo branch of MGIMO150320191619311025112020Copyright © 2019, Morozova A.L.2019The article deals with the theory and practice of the development of the foreign language communicative competence of students of non-linguistic areas of training in the implementation of the current Federal state educational standard of higher education (bachelor's and master's levels), implemented in the educational process of educational organizations subordinated to the Ministry of foreign affairs of the Russian Federation, in order to clarify the pedagogical conditions of the development of that competence. The educational and methodical pedagogical conditions presented by the author are aimed at the comprehensive development of foreign language communicative competence (to know, to be able, to own) of students, in accordance with the results of training (competencies) indicated in the analyzed Federal state educational standard of higher education. The question of the relevance of non-native language proficiency of students and graduates of non-language universities and their competitiveness in the modern domestic and foreign labor market is touched upon. This fact actualizes the development of the readiness of students studying in non-linguistic areas of training to use a foreign language for self-education in the course of training at the Institute and in subsequent professional activities.The tasks and content of the developed educational and methodical pedagogical conditions are considered. The question of the importance of the development of the content of education adequate to requirements of the current time on a subject "Foreign language" is brought up. The author specifies the actual methods of teaching that meet the requirements of the Federal state educational standard of higher education and competence approach: communicative, method of cases, method of projects, audio-linguistic, audiovisual, method of "Openwork saw", etc. Moreover, the requirements to the teaching staff working in the declared direction, for example: confident possession of the computer, the Internet, as well as distance learning technologies are given. The importance and structure of the funds of evaluation tools for the discipline aimed at identifying the real level of foreign language proficiency of students is explained. Evaluation funds allow the teacher to properly organize the educational process, and students to understand the requirements of the teacher.Federal State Educational Standardscompetenceforeign language communicative competencestudentspedagogical conditionsforeign languagemethodologyhigher educationteachingфедеральные государственные образовательные стандартыкомпетенцияиноязычная коммуникативная компетенциястудентыпедагогические условияиностранный языкметодикавысшее образованиепреподавание[Байденко В.И., Белов Е.Б., Богословский В.А. Проектирование государственных образовательных стандартов высшего профессионального образования нового поколения. - М.: Исследовательский центр проблем качества подготовки специалистов, 2005. - С. 137.][Беликов В.А. Философия образования личности: деятельностный аспект: монография. - М.: Владос, 2004. - 357 с.][Воронин А.М., Симоненко В.Д. Педагогические теории, системы, технологии. - Брянск, 2005. - 189 с.][Зимняя И.А. Ключевые компетентности как результативная целевая основа компетентностного подхода в образовании. - М.: Феникс, 2005. - 148 с.][Козырев В.А., Радионова Н.Ф., Тряпицына А.П. Компетентностный подход в педагогическом образовании. - СПб.: РГПУ им. А.И. Герцена, 2005. - С. 392.][Козырева Е.И. Школа педагога-исследователя как условие развития педагогической культуры // Методология и методика естественных наук: Сб. науч. тр. - Вып. 4. - Омск: Изд-во ОмГПУ, 1999. - 24 с.][Костюкова Т.А., Михайлова О.С. Непрерывное педагогическое образование: история, концепции, векторы развития // Образование в Сибири. - 2005. - № 13. - С. 68-72.][Пассов Е.И. Основы коммуникативной методики обучению иноязычной культуре общения. - М.: Русский язык, 2007. - 276 с.][Петровская Л.А. Компетентность в общении. - М.: МГУ, 2006. - 216 с.][Сериков В.В. Компетентностный подход к разработке содержания образования: от идеи к образовательной программе // Известия Волгоградского государственного педагогического университета. - Волгоград: Перемена, 2003. - № 1 (02). - С. 7-13.][Рахманина М.Б. Типология методов обучения иностранным языкам. - М.: Московский лицей, 2008. - 281 с.][Селевко Г.К. Современные образовательные технологии. - М.: Народное образование, 1998. - 256 с.][Хуторской А.В. Ключевые компетенции как компонент личностно-ориентированной парадигмы образования // Народное образование. - 2003. - № 2. - С. 58-64.][Хуторской А.В. Ключевые компетенции. Технология конструирования // Народное образование. - 2003. - № 5. - С. 55-61.][Хушбахтов А.Х. Терминология «педагогические условия» // Молодой ученый. - 2015. - № 23. - С. 1020-1022 [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: https://moluch.ru/archive/103/23955/ (дата обращения: 27.10.2018).][Gardner R.C. A student's contribution to second language learning. Language teaching. London: McMillan, 2002. Р. 36-53.][Hawkins E.W. Modern languages in the curriculum. Cambridge, CUP. 2007. 353 p.][Hutmacher W. Key competencies for Europe // Report of the Symposium Berne, Switzezland. Berlin: Council for Cultural Co-operation, 1997. Р. 43-57.][Kramsch C. Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP, 1993. 241 p.][Krashen S.D., Terrell T.D. The natural approach: language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon, 2003. 542 p.][Little D., Devitt S., Singleton D. Authentic texts in foreign language teaching: theory and practice. Dublin: Authentik, 1998. 384 p.][MacKay W.F. Language teaching analysis. London: Longman, 2005. 531 p.][Savignon S.J. Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. Reading (Mass.). London: Longman, 1983. 142 p.][Gardner R.C. A student’s contribution to second language learning. Language teaching. London: McMillan, 2002. P. 36-53.][Teaching reading in Europe: Contexts, Policies and Practices. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency: 2011. 224 p. [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/Eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/ 130EN.pdf/ (дата обращения 21.09.2018).][Timperley H., Wilson A., Barrar H., Fung I. Teacher Professional Learning and Development. New Zealand: Ministry of education. 2007. 344. [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: http://www.oecd.org/education/school/48727127.pdf (data obrashcheniya 21.09.2018).]